<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labeling the web, one page at a time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/09/labeling-the-web-one-page-at-a-time.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/09/labeling-the-web-one-page-at-a-time.html</link>
	<description>Tech' views that are 667% more interesting than the tech' news itself...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/09/labeling-the-web-one-page-at-a-time.html#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/?p=822#comment-4008</guid>
		<description>Hi Kaitlyn and thanks for the comment.

Answering your question depends on how familiar you are with the &lt;a href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/03/semantic-web-the-found-engine-comes-of-age.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Semantic Web&lt;/a&gt;.

All kinds of amazing things become possible when websites are able to describe themselves in some meaningful way, or are self-classifying, as with the idea proposed by Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who is a major proponent of the Semantic Web.

Right now, there's loads of applications that suggest things like nearest hotels, nearest restaurants et cetera, but most of those services rely entirely on people adding those websites to their directories or applications by hand.

If these websites can describe what they offer, there's no need. Of course, it could open the way for a new kind or spamming, but if we had something that was both elective and democratic — in the sense that you &#038; I could vote and comment on those websites, as we do with Digg and StumbleUpon — the bad would be separated from the good and things like hotels and restaurants would be much easier to find.

Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kaitlyn and thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Answering your question depends on how familiar you are with the <a href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/03/semantic-web-the-found-engine-comes-of-age.html" rel="nofollow">Semantic Web</a>.</p>
<p>All kinds of amazing things become possible when websites are able to describe themselves in some meaningful way, or are self-classifying, as with the idea proposed by Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who is a major proponent of the Semantic Web.</p>
<p>Right now, there&#8217;s loads of applications that suggest things like nearest hotels, nearest restaurants et cetera, but most of those services rely entirely on people adding those websites to their directories or applications by hand.</p>
<p>If these websites can describe what they offer, there&#8217;s no need. Of course, it could open the way for a new kind or spamming, but if we had something that was both elective and democratic — in the sense that you &#038; I could vote and comment on those websites, as we do with Digg and StumbleUpon — the bad would be separated from the good and things like hotels and restaurants would be much easier to find.</p>
<p>Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/09/labeling-the-web-one-page-at-a-time.html#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaitlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/?p=822#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>I guess I'm confused as to the whole logistics of how the labeling would be done, and what the purpose would be.  Sounds like a lot of work for no real benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m confused as to the whole logistics of how the labeling would be done, and what the purpose would be.  Sounds like a lot of work for no real benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

