<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sitelinks explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html</link>
	<description>Tech' views that are 667% more interesting than the tech' news itself...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: paulos72</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>paulos72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>1 - disagree, my site is less than 6 months domain registered
2 - partly agree - the spread of visits throughout my site is fairly even across the main categories
3 - disagree, evidence lacking, my site is mostly brochureware
4 - agree, strongly, my domain share the category keyword and is omnipresent in title+page content
5 - agree

i noticed sitelinks occuring the moment i received no1 ranking on msn (!), adn when i achieved top10 serps for a significant amount of my targeted terms. I also note that my proportion of non homepage entries is very high (like 85%+) - indeed my first sitelink is for the category section that has generated the most inbound traffic overall. I applause Google for the succint way it has scaleably obtained and edited the text for some of my sitelinks.

I agree traffic volumes are unimportant. I would be interested if the probability of receiving sitelinks is proportional to pagerank relative to non homepage entries ratio. If you think about it for a moment, if google thinks your site overall can earn high pagerank, but your traffic is mostly arriving via the back and side doors, then offering the visitor sitelinks for your brandname/domain name makes usability sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 - disagree, my site is less than 6 months domain registered<br />
2 - partly agree - the spread of visits throughout my site is fairly even across the main categories<br />
3 - disagree, evidence lacking, my site is mostly brochureware<br />
4 - agree, strongly, my domain share the category keyword and is omnipresent in title+page content<br />
5 - agree</p>
<p>i noticed sitelinks occuring the moment i received no1 ranking on msn (!), adn when i achieved top10 serps for a significant amount of my targeted terms. I also note that my proportion of non homepage entries is very high (like 85%+) - indeed my first sitelink is for the category section that has generated the most inbound traffic overall. I applause Google for the succint way it has scaleably obtained and edited the text for some of my sitelinks.</p>
<p>I agree traffic volumes are unimportant. I would be interested if the probability of receiving sitelinks is proportional to pagerank relative to non homepage entries ratio. If you think about it for a moment, if google thinks your site overall can earn high pagerank, but your traffic is mostly arriving via the back and side doors, then offering the visitor sitelinks for your brandname/domain name makes usability sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>Good work!

A couple of my sites have sitelinks - but unfortunately neither of them are sites you would search for by name... hence they aren't seen very often...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work!</p>
<p>A couple of my sites have sitelinks - but unfortunately neither of them are sites you would search for by name&#8230; hence they aren&#8217;t seen very often&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2678</guid>
		<description>Well that's the situation I was in, too!

Most of the stuff out there was very vague and unhelpful, so I decided to plan out some research over time to see what I could discover and what theories worked and what didn't.

So in the end, we all benefited!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s the situation I was in, too!</p>
<p>Most of the stuff out there was very vague and unhelpful, so I decided to plan out some research over time to see what I could discover and what theories worked and what didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So in the end, we all benefited!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HostingRef</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>HostingRef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>Excellent article on Google Sitemaps.  I don't think I have come across a better explanation or analysis anywhere, and I have been searching for a long time now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article on Google Sitemaps.  I don&#8217;t think I have come across a better explanation or analysis anywhere, and I have been searching for a long time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>Hi Ralph!

The trick is to write stuff that informs put doesn't empower, unless you already know what needs to be done.

That way, people still have to pay me to do these things for them.

Speak soon and thanks for commenting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ralph!</p>
<p>The trick is to write stuff that informs put doesn&#8217;t empower, unless you already know what needs to be done.</p>
<p>That way, people still have to pay me to do these things for them.</p>
<p>Speak soon and thanks for commenting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webpixelkonsum</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>webpixelkonsum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>Amazing article. How many hours do you write on this article and we get it for free. Thank you.

Ralph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing article. How many hours do you write on this article and we get it for free. Thank you.</p>
<p>Ralph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>Hi guys, just to clarify the traffic volume, I've expanded given a more detailed explanation of &lt;a href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/03/google-webmaster-tools-improves-sitelinks-clarified.html" title="which type of traffic contributes to gaining Sitelinks" rel="nofollow"&gt;which &lt;em&gt;type&lt;/em&gt; of traffic contributes to gaining Sitelinks&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys, just to clarify the traffic volume, I&#8217;ve expanded given a more detailed explanation of <a href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/03/google-webmaster-tools-improves-sitelinks-clarified.html" title="which type of traffic contributes to gaining Sitelinks" >which <em>type</em> of traffic contributes to gaining Sitelinks</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>Very informative article on understanding Google Sitelinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article on understanding Google Sitelinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>What can I say? That was the most in-depth and informative article on Google Sitelinks I have ever read. 
I have noticed that a few of my sites have got Sitelinks when I check in the webmasters tools - so now I just need to do some searching online to see when they start to appear.

Thanks again for the great article.

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say? That was the most in-depth and informative article on Google Sitelinks I have ever read.<br />
I have noticed that a few of my sites have got Sitelinks when I check in the webmasters tools - so now I just need to do some searching online to see when they start to appear.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great article.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adult</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Adult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/02/google-sitelinks-explained.html#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>Great article, my site has site links but I have only noticed them when you search the word "adult" on Google UK then they show up because for some reason it is considered an authority website there but not the US. If you search "webscutest" in the US then they show up. I have not noticed the actual site links pages gaining any traffic at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, my site has site links but I have only noticed them when you search the word &#8220;adult&#8221; on Google UK then they show up because for some reason it is considered an authority website there but not the US. If you search &#8220;webscutest&#8221; in the US then they show up. I have not noticed the actual site links pages gaining any traffic at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
