<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The WSJ doesn&#8217;t get Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/01/the-wsj-doesnt-get-social-media.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/01/the-wsj-doesnt-get-social-media.html</link>
	<description>Tech' views that are 667% more interesting than the tech' news itself...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate Carillo</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/01/the-wsj-doesnt-get-social-media.html#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Carillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/01/the-wsj-doesnt-get-social-media.html#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>So after digging ‘round the WSJ a bit more, we discovered a couple more juicy tidbits to share:

The headlines from “Today’s Newspaper” are available in full and on one page, which is a bonus from a social media standpoint.

Interestingly enough, the only social media nudging to be found is the option to “Digg it” — no comments to build a community, no Newsvine / Reddit / StumbleUpon / Delicious.

What if you subscribe, you ask? You don’t get much more, besides access to the daily section articles from the past 90 days as the top benefit – which begs the question: so when does the free headline content from today’s newspaper get converted to subscription only benefit? Or is only the “inside-the-paper” news part of that perk?

What about the Wall Street Journal’s online content? Well, yes, you can read some of the blog articles for free — so long as you click through “Today’s Newspaper” once again to find them.

Try to click on the “Multimedia &#038; Online Extras” tab and you get the subscription stonewall – shockingly enough, however, by following the trail of blog breadcrumbs from “Today’s Newspaper” associated free links, I get to the “Multimedia &#038; Online Extras” section in full, without subscribing.

Regardless of how you get there, however, yes, you can indeed comment on the blog articles. And even share them on Facebook, Delicious and Digg! I wonder why Facebook and Delicious are options here only?

‘Tis a tangled web we weave of free and subscription-only data that certainly isn’t worth the hassle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after digging ‘round the WSJ a bit more, we discovered a couple more juicy tidbits to share:</p>
<p>The headlines from “Today’s Newspaper” are available in full and on one page, which is a bonus from a social media standpoint.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the only social media nudging to be found is the option to “Digg it” — no comments to build a community, no Newsvine / Reddit / StumbleUpon / Delicious.</p>
<p>What if you subscribe, you ask? You don’t get much more, besides access to the daily section articles from the past 90 days as the top benefit – which begs the question: so when does the free headline content from today’s newspaper get converted to subscription only benefit? Or is only the “inside-the-paper” news part of that perk?</p>
<p>What about the Wall Street Journal’s online content? Well, yes, you can read some of the blog articles for free — so long as you click through “Today’s Newspaper” once again to find them.</p>
<p>Try to click on the “Multimedia &#038; Online Extras” tab and you get the subscription stonewall – shockingly enough, however, by following the trail of blog breadcrumbs from “Today’s Newspaper” associated free links, I get to the “Multimedia &#038; Online Extras” section in full, without subscribing.</p>
<p>Regardless of how you get there, however, yes, you can indeed comment on the blog articles. And even share them on Facebook, Delicious and Digg! I wonder why Facebook and Delicious are options here only?</p>
<p>‘Tis a tangled web we weave of free and subscription-only data that certainly isn’t worth the hassle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet blog &#187; The WSJ doesn’t get Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/01/the-wsj-doesnt-get-social-media.html#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet blog &#187; The WSJ doesn’t get Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blahblahtech.com/2008/01/the-wsj-doesnt-get-social-media.html#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Blah, Blah! Technology and software by Elliott Back   This entry is filed under Internet blog. You can follow any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post by Blah, Blah! Technology and software by Elliott Back   This entry is filed under Internet blog. You can follow any [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.289 seconds -->
