<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8216;blogroll is dead. Viva la citation!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation.html</link>
	<description>Tech' views that are 667% more interesting than the tech' news itself...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation.html#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/07/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation/#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>Hi Colin, thanks for the comment!

Yeah, the conventional thinking is that blogrolls are PageRank gold dust, but it's the exact opposite — they're almost completely ignored for the very reasons you suggest that makes them so strong.

It's because they're repetitive and &lt;em&gt;global&lt;/em&gt;, in terms of navigation, that the search engines really don't give much weight to them.

That's one of the reasons I don't use a blogroll any more, because I'm not actually giving any value.

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Colin, thanks for the comment!</p>
<p>Yeah, the conventional thinking is that blogrolls are PageRank gold dust, but it&#8217;s the exact opposite — they&#8217;re almost completely ignored for the very reasons you suggest that makes them so strong.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because they&#8217;re repetitive and <em>global</em>, in terms of navigation, that the search engines really don&#8217;t give much weight to them.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons I don&#8217;t use a blogroll any more, because I&#8217;m not actually giving any value.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation.html#comment-3021</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/07/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation/#comment-3021</guid>
		<description>Good article. It's a tricky one... a blog-roll link carries a lot of search engine weight... because it is a link from not just one page, but potentially, 100s or even 1000s of pages. I guess the normal rules do still apply, if it isn't relavent, then it isn't overwhelmingly effective... and I guess yes the traffic won't follow either if it is just a random list...
Niceone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. It&#8217;s a tricky one&#8230; a blog-roll link carries a lot of search engine weight&#8230; because it is a link from not just one page, but potentially, 100s or even 1000s of pages. I guess the normal rules do still apply, if it isn&#8217;t relavent, then it isn&#8217;t overwhelmingly effective&#8230; and I guess yes the traffic won&#8217;t follow either if it is just a random list&#8230;<br />
Niceone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation.html#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/07/07/the-blogroll-is-dead-viva-la-citation/#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Just spotted this post again...quite timely to see a headline that asserts the "blogroll is dead", as Google Reader just added functionality that allows one to export subscribed feeds as a blogroll, they're usually sooooo on the ball.

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just spotted this post again&#8230;quite timely to see a headline that asserts the &#8220;blogroll is dead&#8221;, as Google Reader just added functionality that allows one to export subscribed feeds as a blogroll, they&#8217;re usually sooooo on the ball.</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
