<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote for Google!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/vote-for-google.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/vote-for-google.html</link>
	<description>Tech' views that are 667% more interesting than the tech' news itself...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Universal no panacea for all search</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/vote-for-google.html#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Universal no panacea for all search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/03/vote-for-google/#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s other stuff Google could do to add enormous value to personalization by way of social tools, to allow people to ..., in much the same way StumbleUpon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s other stuff Google could do to add enormous value to personalization by way of social tools, to allow people to &#8230;, in much the same way StumbleUpon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media to kill Google&#8217;s search algorithm?</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/vote-for-google.html#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media to kill Google&#8217;s search algorithm?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/03/vote-for-google/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>[...] face it, it&#8217;s not like Google hasn&#8217;t had the chance to make Social Media their own. With their tool bar, Google could have quite easily been where StumbleUpon is right now: “When I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] face it, it&#8217;s not like Google hasn&#8217;t had the chance to make Social Media their own. With their tool bar, Google could have quite easily been where StumbleUpon is right now: “When I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Digg dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/vote-for-google.html#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Digg dead?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/03/vote-for-google/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>[...] what if Google enter into social rating of web pages? They&#8217;ve certainly got the means to do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what if Google enter into social rating of web pages? They&#8217;ve certainly got the means to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search to get a social Sproose up?</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/vote-for-google.html#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Search to get a social Sproose up?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/03/vote-for-google/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>[...] the big players, Google is the one with the resources and the smarts to make something like social search fly. But do they? Do they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the big players, Google is the one with the resources and the smarts to make something like social search fly. But do they? Do they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
