<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TinyURL is good, but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/tinyurl-is-good-but.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/tinyurl-is-good-but.html</link>
	<description>Tech' views that are 667% more interesting than the tech' news itself...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Buerki</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/tinyurl-is-good-but.html#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Buerki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/27/tinyurl-is-good-but/#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>If you like TinyURL, you might also want to check out http://traceurl.com

TraceURL shortens any URL plus it tracks traffic to the page through the TraceURL shortened web site address, showing where the traffic originated. Count accesses and have the origin of the visitor displayed on a Google Map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like TinyURL, you might also want to check out <a href="http://traceurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://traceurl.com</a></p>
<p>TraceURL shortens any URL plus it tracks traffic to the page through the TraceURL shortened web site address, showing where the traffic originated. Count accesses and have the origin of the visitor displayed on a Google Map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/tinyurl-is-good-but.html#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/27/tinyurl-is-good-but/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think you're probably right, it's sweat shop spam to get around captchas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think you&#8217;re probably right, it&#8217;s sweat shop spam to get around captchas</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/tinyurl-is-good-but.html#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/27/tinyurl-is-good-but/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Hi David!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As I understand it, TinyURL keep the URL at their end.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So if the trusted URL doesn't match their records, then it's sure to be spam, or at the very least, niavete.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Spoofing CAPTCHAs is a little more sophisticated, because that's waiting for a big leap in AI optical recognition.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But, there may well be &lt;a HREF="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2006/11/spammers-outsourcing-to-india.html" REL="nofollow"&gt;a low-tech' 3rd-world way around CAPTCHAs...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David!</p>
<p>As I understand it, TinyURL keep the URL at their end.</p>
<p>So if the trusted URL doesn&#8217;t match their records, then it&#8217;s sure to be spam, or at the very least, niavete.</p>
<p>Spoofing CAPTCHAs is a little more sophisticated, because that&#8217;s waiting for a big leap in AI optical recognition.</p>
<p>But, there may well be <a HREF="http://www.blahblahtech.com/2006/11/spammers-outsourcing-to-india.html" REL="nofollow">a low-tech&#8217; 3rd-world way around CAPTCHAs&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.blahblahtech.com/2007/05/tinyurl-is-good-but.html#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sv2.mhlists.net/~wwwblah/index.php/2007/05/27/tinyurl-is-good-but/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a useful idea, there are, of course, lots of other shrink-wrapped URL creators out there, but if I'm not missing something, isn't there a tiny problem with your scheme? Who will add the trusted tag to the URL. SpamBots will always find a way to get around automatic tagging systems, just look at how some work round captchas and even Akismet and Bad Behavior.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I stand to be corrected if I've misinterpreted, of course...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Incidentally, I wrote a post about how to use &lt;a HREF="www.sciencetext.com/miniaturize-your-urls-in-gmail.html" REL="nofollow"&gt;TinyURL within GMail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a useful idea, there are, of course, lots of other shrink-wrapped URL creators out there, but if I&#8217;m not missing something, isn&#8217;t there a tiny problem with your scheme? Who will add the trusted tag to the URL. SpamBots will always find a way to get around automatic tagging systems, just look at how some work round captchas and even Akismet and Bad Behavior.</p>
<p>I stand to be corrected if I&#8217;ve misinterpreted, of course&#8230;</p>
<p>Incidentally, I wrote a post about how to use <a HREF="www.sciencetext.com/miniaturize-your-urls-in-gmail.html" REL="nofollow">TinyURL within GMail</a></p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

